On Thursday, 26 November 2015 at 12:43:54 UTC, Chris wrote:
TOML looks nice, _but_ it's version 0.4.0. We cannot afford to maintain a parser for a format that hasn't "settled down" yet.
Why not use a well defined subset of YAML then?
Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d Thu, 26 Nov 2015 05:16:36 -0800
On Thursday, 26 November 2015 at 12:43:54 UTC, Chris wrote:
TOML looks nice, _but_ it's version 0.4.0. We cannot afford to maintain a parser for a format that hasn't "settled down" yet.
Why not use a well defined subset of YAML then?