On Thursday, 14 July 2016 at 20:12:13 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
And please note that this horrible excuse is propagate in the C++ community too. Time and time again people claim that C++ is complex, but it has to be like that in order to provide the features it provides.

Not true for C++.

Not true for D.

Your suggestion for static analysis goes the same way: static analysis is way more complex than D currently is, but you suggest it must be this complex?

Reply via email to