On Saturday, 16 July 2016 at 06:36:33 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Not sure what you mean.
1. It is more time consuming to write an analysis engine that
can cover convoluted machinery than simple machinery.
2. It it more difficult to extend complex machinery than simple
machinery.
3. It is more work to figure out adequate simple machinery to
describe complex machinery, than just keeping things simple
from the start.
Not very surprising that experienced language designers try to
keep the core language as simple as possible?
You can lower D to Assembler and analyze that. Assembler is
simple, isn't it?
