On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 08:02:42 eugene via Digitalmars-d wrote: > Hello, everyone, > will ISO D be in future or not?
The future? Maybe. But it's unlikely to happen soon. As a whole, the language is pretty solid, but there are details that still need to be ironed out spec-wise, there are a few cases where features need to be completed or expanded, and we're likely to be adding a feature or two to solve some of the current problems (e.g. Walter is working on adding ref-counting to the language so that less depends on the GC). So, while D's language definition is _far_ more stable than it once was, it's still in enough flux that a standard wouldn't make a lot of sense yet. - Jonathan M Davis
