On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 at 11:34:01 UTC, eugene wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 at 10:47:35 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 at 08:02:42 UTC, eugene wrote:
will ISO D be in future or not?
What would be the benefits?
unified language standard?
While the spec might not be 100% perfect, it tries to be a
unified language standard. After all D already has four different
compilers: DMD, LDC, GDC, and SDC.
So imho the best thing to do is to improve the "dirty" bits in
the spec that have hidden assumptions or aren't clear enough, but
that's a steady process which is done without an ISO spec.
Besides who do you prefer to have control over the language: the
D Foundation or an international company (which you have to keep
on your payroll)?
