On 08/17/2016 02:34 PM, eugene wrote: > On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 at 10:47:35 UTC, qznc wrote: >> On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 at 08:02:42 UTC, eugene wrote: >>> will ISO D be in future or not? >> >> What would be the benefits? > > unified language standard?
Unified among whom? There is only one feature complete D frontend right now. I'd say that the moment second competing frontend appears would be exactly the proper time to think about formal standartization.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
