On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 at 08:48:12 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 08:02:42 eugene via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Hello, everyone,
will ISO D be in future or not?
The future? Maybe. But it's unlikely to happen soon. As a
whole, the language is pretty solid, but there are details that
still need to be ironed out spec-wise, there are a few cases
where features need to be completed or expanded, and we're
likely to be adding a feature or two to solve some of the
current problems (e.g. Walter is working on adding ref-counting
to the language so that less depends on the GC). So, while D's
language definition is _far_ more stable than it once was, it's
still in enough flux that a standard wouldn't make a lot of
sense yet.
- Jonathan M Davis
is it probably 5 years for ISO D to happen or more?
