On Monday, July 16, 2012 09:25:54 Jacob Carlborg wrote: > On 2012-07-16 02:20, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > > If someone has a better proposal, they should make it (though probably in > > a > > separate thread - this one's long enough as it is). I think that the > > basics of this proposal are good, and a lot of projects work that way. I > > just think that D needs to be more stable before we worry about having > > major and minor releases or stable and unstable branches. > > Wasn't that what you just said two posts up? To have major and minor > releases. Major containing new features and minor only bug fixes.
Isn't that essentially whan the OP's proposal was? We'd have 2.x.y where x is for major releases and y is for minor releases, with only bug fixes being permitted in minor releases. I don't think that I've proposed any other versioning schemes than what the OP was proposing. If I did, I misunderstood something. - Jonathan M Davis
