On 16/07/12 23:33, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
We're talking about doing something similar to having 2.x.y, with the main branch incrementing x and the "stable" branch incrementing y. Going to v3 would mean incrementing the 2. We have _no_ intention of doing that for years to come.
Just to note that, in the sense of making major changes to the language design, you're obviously right -- but I don't see the problem with bumping the major version number just to indicate that some key milestone has been passed (e.g. implementing in entirely the features described in TDPL).
That might even be a _good_ way of indicating to the wider development world that you have a really well-defined stable release.
