On 7/16/12 5:33 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
We're talking about doing something similar to having 2.x.y, with the main branch incrementing x and the "stable" branch incrementing y.
That seems a simple, nice scheme. Andrei
On 7/16/12 5:33 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
We're talking about doing something similar to having 2.x.y, with the main branch incrementing x and the "stable" branch incrementing y.
That seems a simple, nice scheme. Andrei