On Monday, July 16, 2012 23:29:30 RivenTheMage wrote: > On Monday, 16 July 2012 at 20:45:11 UTC, SomeDude wrote: > > This way, the stable branch and the dev branch don't diverge to > > the point that there effectively become two versions of the > > same language. > > I think, they should be diverging. > > The stable branch should be "the TDPL branch". After reaching > point of TDPL-compliance (top priority for the branch), only > bugfixes and non-breaking features must be accepted (like COFF > support). > > The dev branch should be "the DMD3/TDPLv2 branch": a cutting edge > version of the D language.
We're talking about doing something similar to having 2.x.y, with the main branch incrementing x and the "stable" branch incrementing y. Going to v3 would mean incrementing the 2. We have _no_ intention of doing that for years to come. - Jonathan M Davis
