you just made my point once again.

 > I nor anyone else could say a thing that would please
 > you.


At 08:31 PM 2/20/06, you wrote:
>Lets take this in two parts, John.
>
>1. In your original post (message 13673) you said "You know it not
>always the fault of the automatic station but more the user". In the
>scenario you describe below, what did the "user" being QRM'd do
>wrong?
>
>2. Why is it unreasonable to expect the automatic station to verify
>that the frequency is clear before transmitting? In its decision to
>allow automatic operation, the FCC said "First, the control operator
>of the station that is connected to the automatically controlled
>station must prevent the automatically controlled station from
>causing interference." As your scenario perfectly illustrates, the
>person who remotely activates the automatic station can't reliably
>prevent the automatic station from causing interference by simply
>listening to the frequency at his or her end. Only a "listener" at
>the automatic station can ensure this. That "listener" could be a
>human operator who only enables his or her automatic station when
>present to prevent interference, or it could be a circuit and/or
>algorithm that detects a busy frequency. Either way, there is no
>excuse for failure to prevent interference with an ongoing QSO, as
>is required.
>
>The FCC quote can be found in
>http://home.earthlink.net/~bscottmd/fcc97221.htm ; its in paragraph
>6. Note that its dated April 1995. The requirement to prevent
>interference has been in force for many years.
>
>     73,
>
>         Dave, AA6YQ



Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org

Other areas of interest:

The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol  (band plan policy discussion)

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to