Dave- let's face it, it's clear that johns' mind is made up about what your mind is made up about.
(There- I said it, and I'm glad!) Bill-W4BSG Dave Bernstein wrote: >Re: "But you and others already have you mind made up with this anti >wide and pactor attitude" > >I am neither opposed to wide modes, nor opposed to Pactor. I operate >RTTY frequently, and Pactor on occasion. > >You have made this allegation before, John. The first time, I >privately challenged you to cite any post here or anywhere else >where I opposed wide mode or Pactor operation. You (grudgingly) >acknowledged the absence of any such statement from me. Now you're >repeating allegations that you know are false. > >Why would you do that? > >For the record, my opposition is to automatic stations that transmit >without listening to ensure a clear frequency. This opposition is >entirely independent of bandwidth or mode. > > 73, > > Dave, AA6YQ > >--- In [email protected], John Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Dave I could talk till I was blue in the face about ready >>to drop dead. But you and others already have you mind >>made up with this anti wide and pactor attitude. >> >>I nor anyone else could say a thing that would please >>you. >> >>Lets try the guy 150 miles from you well within your >>ring of silence (you can't copy each other if you had to) >>listens to the frenquncy (unable to ask if the frequency >>is in use on every mode known to man) hears nothing. >>brings up the auto station and in doing so QRM's a QSO >>on the same frequency that he did not hear. >> >>Now as I see it that is not the fault of the auto station. >>But I know you are going to say that the auto station >>*should* be able to tell if it was in use. And that is getting >>real old with me. >> >> >> >> >>At 06:47 PM 2/20/06, you wrote: >> >> >>>Yes, lots of talk, but no description of an actual scenario that >>>substantiates that talk. >>> >>>The explanation, I believe, is that there is no such scenario. If >>> >>> >you > > >>>disagree, describe the scenario. >>> >>> 73, >>> >>> Dave, AA6YQ >>> >>> >>> >>>--- In [email protected], John Becker <w0jab@> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>This has been talked about by many >>>>Me for one. >>>> >>>>At 05:32 PM 2/20/06, you wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>I have never seen you or any one else here describe a >>>>> >>>>> >scenario in > > >>>>>which someone already in QSO on a frequency is QRM'd by an >>>>> >>>>> >automatic > > >>>>>station, and the fault doesn't lie with the automatic station. >>>>> >>>>>If you can describe such a scenario, please do so. >>>>> >>>>> 73, >>>>> >>>>> Dave, AA6YQ >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org >>> >>>Other areas of interest: >>> >>>The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ >>>DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy >>> >>> >discussion) > > >>>Yahoo! Groups Links >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > > > > > >Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org > >Other areas of interest: > >The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ >DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > -- Bill Aycock W4BSG Woodville, Alabama Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
