Why not do it for everyone, every mode ?
At 09:19 PM 2/24/06, you wrote: >Why not require WinLink and similar apps to poll both >ends to be sure *neither* hears anything *prior* to >engaging a continued QSO? > >This should neutralize the "could not hear them at my >end" problem. > >Station A checks the frequency for activity and finds >nothing. Station A then calls Station B (or issues a >general CQ). When Station B replies Station A acknowledges >then goes silent until Station B also checks for activity. >*Only* when *both* have verified that their QSO will not >QRM an existing QSO may they QSO. > >There *has* to be a solution to the automatic station >QRM challenge (whether one postulates it as rare or as >common it is a serious problem that will grow if the >mode grows in popularity). > >Does my suggestion have technical merit? > >73, doc kd4e Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
