> John Becker w0jab wrote: > Yes there has got to be a place for the wide 3500Hz > keyboard-to-keyboard as well as for the semi-automatic > operators with enough room for both.
Hi John, I agree with you. My original "Bandwidth-Based Frequency Plan" (which predated ARRL's FCC proposal) listed wider bandwidths, such as a 20meters 3kHz segment from 14075 to 14350. This would provide much more freedom for hams, whether keyboarding, automatic, or experimental than ARRL's proposal does: http://www.qsl.net/kq6xa/freqplan/ Bonnie KQ6XA ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design. http://us.click.yahoo.com/XISQkA/lOaOAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
