>will be intolerable unless > >operators of semi-automatic stations start losing their licenses if > >their stations habitually QRM in-progress QSOs while responding to > >remote requests. >
but Dave, how is this kind of QRM routinely dealt with by the FCC? I'm talking about any time a station starts a QSO on an already occupied frequency, regardless of mode. Does not the offending station simply have to say "I listened and heard no QSO". How would FCC license-taking-away offcials be able to prove that the offending operator either did not listen, or listened and heard someone but ignored them? I guess if not actually in control of the station that might be proved. I guess I'm at the point of suggesting that we just cope with the QRM. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Something is new at Yahoo! Groups. Check out the enhanced email design. http://us.click.yahoo.com/SISQkA/gOaOAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
