Denis Oliver Kropp wrote:
> Marcel Siegert schrieb:
>> On Tuesday 06 March 2007, Denis Oliver Kropp wrote:
>> --snip--
>>>> svn has advantages e.g. like moving files & history....
>>> What else?
>>>
>> http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/comparison.html
>> you may have a look what other people say on different systems
>> and capabilities
>>
>>>> i dont like them, haven't worked that much with git but
>>>> i do know mercurial and that one sucks.
>>>> also for a developer imho it is not to known all commands
>>>> and different workflows of all those scm's.
>>> At least git is used for the kernel, so it's not just another
>>> scm that you have to know about :)
>> and subversion is used for gcc
>> it that a reason to switch?
>> i just use git to get an actual kernel tree to test some stuff,
>> not to manage sources
>>
>>>> svn is nearly the same syntax as cvs, so also user could step
>>>> over without any rejections, just taking the advantages.
>>>>
>>>> on linuxtv.org each modification (to prevent too much conflicts)
>>>> should be in a seperate repository.
>>> It doesn't have to be like that. One main, plus optional repositories,
>>> e.g. the new wm branch could be its own.
>> it doesnt have to but it may work out to this scenario.
>>
>>>> so you have to have one repo e.g. where you develop new things,
>>>> one for clean to pull from, and
>>>> if like you have, loads of repos must be pulled, merged, ect.
>>>> imho that is much more work.
>>
>>> As the number of repositories I'm going to manage won't grow
>>> with that move it could only become simpler.
>> yes, in your case
>>
>>>> why do you have the need of those different distributed repos?
>>>> (c)opyrighted maybe nda stuff?
>>> No, it's for easier management. It's even to make flowing back
>>> to the mainline faster! :)
>> ok, that counts in your case.
>> what about the other dev's? same probs or can they cope with the current
>> developement
>> model?
>>
>>
>> at least i am out of this discussion now, otherwise it may evolve into an
>> endless
>> for-against thread.
>>
>> my statements in a kind of summary
>> - you, denis, are the maintainer of this project
>> - if you decide to go for git, go for it
>> - i dont like this idea and the idea of distributed repositories
>> - wait for other statements of e.g. ville, claudio, mike....
>> sorry if i forgot someone
>
> Yes, let's hear others :)
>
> I wouldn't go for git, if nobody wanted it.
>
svn for me.
--
Regards,
Claudio Ciccani
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://directfb.org
http://sf.net/projects/php-directfb
_______________________________________________
directfb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
