Quoting Ed Sweetman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Finally, is Xdirectfb more accellerated for say the matrox G4xx card > than xfree86 is, not counting dga/xv and gl, in 2d?
Only a few X11 drawing operations are accelerated yet. All 'in-window' drawing is done by X11. But if you are moving a top level window, it will be done with full acceleration by DirectFB. And there's no effect like in XFree when windows are exposed. If you are moving a window on top of another the below one won't repaint itself frequently. > Does xdirectfb aim to duplicate the functionality of xfree86 with such > things as RENDER and xv and all that or something different? Extensions like Xrender, Xv and Xdga will be implemented in XDirectFB some day. But the functionality of all these extensions is already available via the native DirectFB API. -- Best regards, Denis Oliver Kropp .------------------------------------------. | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | | http://www.directfb.org/ | "------------------------------------------" Convergence GmbH -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe directfb-users" as subject.
