Quoting Ed Sweetman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Denis Oliver Kropp wrote: > >Quoting Ed Sweetman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > >>Finally, is Xdirectfb more accellerated for say the matrox G4xx card > >>than xfree86 is, not counting dga/xv and gl, in 2d? > > > > > >Only a few X11 drawing operations are accelerated yet. All 'in-window' > >drawing is done by X11. But if you are moving a top level window, it > >will be done with full acceleration by DirectFB. And there's no effect > >like in XFree when windows are exposed. If you are moving a window on > >top of another the below one won't repaint itself frequently. > > > > > >>Does xdirectfb aim to duplicate the functionality of xfree86 with such > >>things as RENDER and xv and all that or something different? > > > > > >Extensions like Xrender, Xv and Xdga will be implemented in XDirectFB > >some day. But the functionality of all these extensions is already > >available via the native DirectFB API. > > > > > So then it's just a matter of someone (me?) porting xawtv or similar > program to the directFB api to get the same performance?
Yes, but there are already some programs as mentioned in another mail. -- Best regards, Denis Oliver Kropp .------------------------------------------. | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | | http://www.directfb.org/ | "------------------------------------------" Convergence GmbH -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe directfb-users" as subject.
