> On 16 Feb 2007, at 17:29, Stefan Bidigaray wrote: > >> What I actually meant was, isn't the Mac layout exactly like the >> OPENSTEP >> layout? > > Not at all. OPENSTEP on the left, Mac on the right: > > /NextApps /Applications > /NextAdmin (/Applications/Utilities, /System/Library/CoreServices, / > Applications) > /NextLibrary /System/Library > /NextDeveloper /Developer > /LocalApps /Applications > /LocalAdmin /Applications > /LocalLibrary /Library > > I think the User and Network domains had the same layout, but maybe > OPENSTEP had Apps instead of Applications in each.
I could of course encode that as a filesystem layout ;-) Had to play hard-and-fast with some of the dir naming, but I think a NeXT-esque layout would look something like this. Yes, it is a bit ugly and no, I don't think I'd really use this layout ;-) Cheers, Graham. P.S. squirrelmail appears to have attached the file as type application/octet-stream...it is in fact text/plain with ASCII charset.
next
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
