Thanks! :-) Many people in GNUstep seem to like looking at these historical layouts (I find it fascinating myself, even if I never had a NeXTSTEP), so I think we should add them, even if we're not actually likely to use them ... so I committed this. :-)
Thanks PS: If Sergii can complete his mac one (should we call it 'apple' ?), we could add that one as well ? Do we need other unix layouts or fhs is the only one we want ? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sat, February 17, 2007 8:37 pm To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Customizable filesystem support for GNUstep > On 16 Feb 2007, at 17:29, Stefan Bidigaray wrote: > >> What I actually meant was, isn't the Mac layout exactly like the >> OPENSTEP >> layout? > > Not at all. OPENSTEP on the left, Mac on the right: > > /NextApps /Applications > /NextAdmin (/Applications/Utilities, /System/Library/CoreServices, / > Applications) > /NextLibrary /System/Library > /NextDeveloper /Developer > /LocalApps /Applications > /LocalAdmin /Applications > /LocalLibrary /Library > > I think the User and Network domains had the same layout, but maybe > OPENSTEP had Apps instead of Applications in each. I could of course encode that as a filesystem layout ;-) Had to play hard-and-fast with some of the dir naming, but I think a NeXT-esque layout would look something like this. Yes, it is a bit ugly and no, I don't think I'd really use this layout ;-) Cheers, Graham. P.S. squirrelmail appears to have attached the file as type application/octet-stream...it is in fact text/plain with ASCII charset._______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
