On 23 Nov 2007, at 20:00, Nicolas Roard wrote:
On Nov 23, 2007 7:45 PM, Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wouldn't do that either. It's like writing a master thesis in
LATeX
ttoally off topic, but LaTeX is prertty much a requirement in
academia
in the UK still (?!). I thought it had vanished, but my flatmate had
a job editing papers for journals and it is all required to be
submitted
in LaTeX. erp!
Frankly I wouldn't want to write a paper or thesis in anything else
than LaTeX...
Not that we couldn't have great graphical tools for that; but we don't
right now.
I'd love to have written my thesis or my book in something better than
LaTeX. I fully intend to abandon it as soon as something better exists.
Back on-topic, something like LaTeX for GUI design would be great.
Currently, we have two options for GNUstep:
- Gorm, which is like FrameMaker. You lay out your page (app) exactly
as you want it to appear to the end user.
- Renaissance, which is like HTML. You lay out your app roughly with
some markup and hope it will look how you wanted it.
The ideal solution would be something like LaTeX, where you define the
interactions you need, and it pulls in 40 years of HCI research to
design a beautiful UI that embodies these interactions, with a
\documentclass equivalent so you could make it conform to a set of
predefined platform HIGs. Unfortunately, I haven't yet decided
whether designing such a system is impossible or just really, really
hard.
David
P.S. Three times today, I've managed to send a reply to a mail on
this list to the sender, not to the list. Is there any sane reason
why this list does not set Reply-To: to the list address? Every
mailing list except this one that I've ever subscribed to has had the
reply button send a message to the list.
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
