@Nikolaus ... Yeah I'd agree with that. You can evoke retro without
necessarily looking outdated in the negative sense.
On Nov 29, 2015 2:48 PM, "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Am 29.11.2015 um 15:16 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <
> [email protected]>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Gregory Casamento wrote:
> >>> I absolutely want "our" menus, they are distinctive and useful and if
> I were
> >>> >to make a reference distribution, I'd want to retain that.
> >> They are OLD.   More important than their usefulness is what they
> >> invoke and that is they make people think that we are NeXTSTEP and
> >> OPENSTEP only.  Like it or not our old look is part of our problem.
> >> I'm sorry you don't like this fact, but it is based on tons of first
> >> hand observation over the last ten years.
> >
> > I'm sorry you mix look and with interface design. Facts and factoids.
> >
> > Actually, our menus are NEW, they are newer than in-window menus and
> one-menu-bar on the top which came from Mac and Motif/OS2/Windows. They
> have close parents and predecessors (e.g. SGI menus, Amiga menus) but NeXT
> made them consistent.
> >
> > The interaction with our menus makes NeXT & GNUstep distinctive and as
> trying to port applications back and forth it allows for a unique
> interaction. It allows, for example to have very smooth document based
> applications which are impossible to achieve (as still the latest office
> suite of a big software company proves) with in-window menus.
> > It offers the same functionality as a top menu bar, but is more flexible
> and works well with big screens or multiple-screens. We do not need to
> invent things like "tearable menus" and even "palettes" are not strictly
> necessary.
> >
> > Thus, playing the same song is of no good for anybody.
>
> That is IMHO all correct about being distinctive, unique and consistent
> over multiple screens, but you don't see that in a screenshot. There you
> only get the look, not the feel.
>
> Imagine, someone from outside our community successfully installs GNUstep,
> is happy about how applications work and writes a blog entry, he/she will
> add screen shots which indeed looks old fashioned to his/her readers. This
> spreads a negative touch (except for fans of retro look). Unless some
> default theme looks "modern" or "vivid" or "up-to-date".
>
> Just my 2 cts.
>
> BR,
> Nikolaus
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep

Reply via email to