Hi Riccardo, i think asking for a use case For a technology Demonstration or a 
Fun project does not make Sense.
Would be like having two ships going the same Route. There is no use case for a 
bridge between both but it is good to have one. Just in case...
And of you ask for a use case you could question what gnustep is good for if 
there is wxwidgets or vice versa.
Let real Users decide of they like wxgnustep or not...

On The Road

> Am 04.06.2021 um 22:18 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]>:
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> 
> On 5/31/21 9:04 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>> Viceversa, it makes no sense for GNUstep to target WX, since it is already 
>>> highly portable at all levels.
>> Except for existing C++ applications using wxWidgets. Nobody can easily port 
>> them to GNUstep.
>> 
> 
> sorry, but I still don't get the use-case of having wxCocoa just plain on 
> GNUstep without more.
> 
> 
> 
> If you have a wx program written in C++ you can already port it to Windows, 
> Cocoa and Unix/X11.
> 
> If you have an Obj-C AppKit program you can use it either directly on Mac or 
> with GNUstep on Windows and Unix/X11
> 
> So what would you gain with having wxCocoa on GNUstep if you want to expose 
> only the wx C++ interface? I still think nothing... there are no more targets 
> GNUstep has which wx doesn't have.
> 
> 
> 
> Riccardo

Reply via email to