You can read the ICANN agreements that Registrars are supposed to sign.
It clearly states the rules we must abide by to maintain our
accreditation. We have to extend those rules to the RSP - there's a very
fine line that states what we're indemnified by your contract and what
we're not covered by... It's much easier (until there's some
clarification or an alteration in the rules) to stay clear away from that
line.
This does not mean that we're not going to provide better control for our
RSPs in the near future - or that we will. William has a good point -
it's much more complicated than providing a simple interface and logic to
solve the problem.
We all have to employ a CYA policy to ensure that all our businesses can
remain in place - if ONE RSP damages our accreditation, you all lose out.
ALL of you.
Charles Daminato
OpenSRS Support Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Swerve wrote:
> This issue has arisen on this list before.
> Perhaps someone from Opensrs can explain their position,
> and / or refer to a previous post from Opensrs about this.
>
> Personally and professionally, the more security around domain names, the
> better.
>
> Swerve
>
> > From: "ecs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 19:52:41 -0500
> > To: "William X. Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "ecs"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: "Dave Warren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Southpaw/NINEpm"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "OpenSRS Discussion List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE: Re[2]: Transfers in general
> >
> > William,
> >
> > You sound like a broken record.
> >
> > I've asked you before to gave an example of an RSP that has
> > done something seriously wrong to a client to justify your
> > attitude toward RSPs.
> >
> > I'm still waiting for you to provide that example to the
> > list.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William
> > X. Walsh
> > Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2000 12:42 PM
> > To: ecs
> > Cc: Dave Warren; Southpaw/NINEpm; OpenSRS Discussion List
> > Subject: Re[2]: Transfers in general
> >
> >
> > Hello ecs,
> >
> > Sunday, September 03, 2000, 8:48:14 AM, you wrote:
> >
> >> And yes, I know some on this list will respond that one
> > RSP
> >> out of the thousands with OpenSRS may be a bad apple, so
> >> none of the RSPs should be trusted to have an impact on
> > this
> >> decision. Sorry, but I still do not buy the argument that
> >> some day in the far far future there might be a bad RSP,
> > so
> >> let's punish all RSPs today.
> >
> > And when OpenSRS's accreditation is at risk over denying
> > transfers for
> > false reasons, are you going to indemnify them?
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > William
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
