Great Work !!!! Get 'em boys. Such forgers should be hanged till death.
Ashish
____________________________________________________________________________
______
Monitor your web site, every hour, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year for FREE
at www.industrialmag.com
----- Original Message -----
From: William X. Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 0:06
Subject: Re[5]: Just WHO IS Bruce P.?
>
> It's the people at dotcomnic.net I'm 95% positive of it.
>
> I'll post why. I've taken emails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (who is part
> of the dotcomnic.net site, and has previously been busted on the
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] list as posting as a "customer" of their RSP and
> raving about how great it was) and compared them to headers in the
> BruceP forgeries.
>
> From the susancho email:
> X-Priority: 3
> X-SMTP-HELO: mail4.maxis.net.my
> X-SMTP-MAIL-FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-SMTP-PEER-INFO: [172.16.1.116]
>
> From the "BruceP" email:
> X-SMTP-HELO: mail4.maxis.net.my
> X-SMTP-MAIL-FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-SMTP-PEER-INFO: [172.16.1.116]
>
> Notice the localnet address from behind their NAT router?
>
> There are other exact match hits that show that these emails are
> coming from their network, if someone compares the headers some more.
>
> Personally, its the kind of actions I've come to expect from them
> based on their past actions and behaviors (including a widespread spam
> effort a couple years back when they wanted to replace the APNIC with
> their own company being the IP registry).
>
> Dotcomnic.net: stop playing games. You've been busted, yet again.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
