Hello Dassa,
Wednesday, September 20, 2000, 4:34:23 AM, you wrote:
> "William X. Walsh" wrote:
>>
>> The problem here is that one RSP was impersonating another.
>> Dotcomnic.net has had a bad reputation on other mailing lists for
>> pulling "scams" such as posting as a customer of dotcomnic.net and
>> raving about their services and prices, etc. IMO OpenSRS should
>> issue a stern warning against dotcomnic.net, and possibly restrict
>> them to read only access to the list for abusing their posting
>> privileges, not to mention the potential defaming of a reputable RSP
>> who is an active and valuable participant on this forum.
>>
>> I'm of two minds about the RSP only access to the discuss list. In my
>> mind it does somewhat go against the openness that this service is
>> supposed to be advocating as a part of their model.
>>
> DHS has found that the domain maxis.net.my is an insecured (open) relay
> so
> forged mail can flow through easily.
Yes, but in this case, the same localnet IP behind the firewall is in
the headers added by their NT mail server. That wouldn't happen
unless it was coming from the same machine behind their NAT firewall.
--
Best regards,
William mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
