Hello Joe, Thursday, October 26, 2000, 1:33:38 AM, you wrote: > On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, William X. Walsh wrote: >> > It's clear to me .. it's clear to the lawyers .. and it's called "don't >> > tresspass or else". >> >> The US Courts (which is what ICANN has to answer to) do not agree with >> you. (reference Image Online Design vs CORE) > William - may i suggest you take the time to read the law. In short you > don't know what your talking about. Image Online Design vs CORE is > irrelevant to the issue. This has nothing to do with trade marks. Wrong > law William ;-) So you say, Joe. So you say. But actions speak a lot louder than words, and me thinks that none of the renegade registries have a legal leg to stand on in trying to claim exclusive use of the TLD strings they have squatted on. -- Best regards, William mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Can you see GOD? (fwd) adam
- Re: Can you see GOD? (fwd) !Dr. Joe Baptista
- Re: Can you see GOD? (fwd) adam
- Re: Can you see GOD? (fwd) Marc Schneiders
- Re: Can you see GOD? (fwd) Shifter
- Re: Can you see GOD? (fwd) Eric Paynter
- Re: Can you see GOD? (fwd) Joe Baptista
- Re[2]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) Joe Baptista
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (f... !Dr. Joe Baptista
- Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (f... !Dr. Joe Baptista
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (f... Eric Paynter
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (f... adam
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (f... Dave Warren
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (f... adam
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (f... Dave Warren
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (f... adam
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (f... Dave Warren
