> Yes, and my answer to both of those points is as you pointed out - that's > where ICANN come in. I think we're at cross-purposes here. I was under the > impression that you thought <infinity> TLD's was a bad thing. You seemed to > get the impression that I'm suggesting some kind of TLD anarchy. As a matter of fact, I DO believe that infinate TLDs are a bad thing. I see it going the way .COM has gone, all the good names taken, and we'll be reduced to having to settle for long clumbsy sounding names, or purchaing a second level domain and working from there. > The roots should have been opened up ages ago. The alternative registrars > have proved beyond doubt that it can work. I can't find a single ISP that actually uses them. *shrugs* Can you tell me any major ISPs that do?
- Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) !Dr. Joe Baptista
- Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) !Dr. Joe Baptista
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) Eric Paynter
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) adam
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) Dave Warren
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) adam
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) Dave Warren
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) adam
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) Dave Warren
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) !Dr. Joe Baptista
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) Eric Paynter
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) !Dr. Joe Baptista
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) Dave Warren
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) Eric Paynter
- Re: Re[4]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) adam
- Re[6]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) William X. Walsh
- Re[6]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[6]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) Joe Baptista
- Re[8]: Can you see GOD? (fwd) William X. Walsh
