> Yes, and my answer to both of those points is as you pointed out  - that's
> where ICANN come in. I think we're at cross-purposes here. I was under the
> impression that you thought <infinity> TLD's was a bad thing. You seemed
to
> get the impression that I'm suggesting some kind of TLD anarchy.

As a matter of fact, I DO believe that infinate TLDs are a bad thing.  I see
it going the way .COM has gone, all the good names taken, and we'll be
reduced to having to settle for long clumbsy sounding names, or purchaing a
second level domain and working from there.

> The roots should have been opened up ages ago. The alternative registrars
> have proved beyond doubt that it can work.

I can't find a single ISP that actually uses them.  *shrugs*  Can you tell
me any major ISPs that do?


Reply via email to