On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, at 19:53 [=GMT-0000], adam wrote: > "William X. Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > Domain aggregators are scum, however, and deserve > > > nothing less than LARTing. > > > > Yes, so are commodity speculators. Better ban them also. > > > Exactly the kind of response I have come to expect from you William, well > done. > > I dunno, next ye'll be telling me that spam is ok, and ye actually enjoy > getting huge quanities of unsolicited rubbish in your Inboxes. You people are > nuts. Would you be so very kind to enlighten my little brain about the similarities between domain name speculators and spammers, apart from that you both dislike them? -- Marc Schneiders (rest in header)
- Re: .web, .nom... adam
- Re[2]: .web, .nom,... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: .we... Marc Schneiders
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... Lee Hodgson (DomainGuideBook.com)
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... adam
- Re: .web, .nom, .s... Swerve
- Re[2]: .web, .... Florian Effenberger
- Re: .web, .nom, .s... Marc Schneiders
- Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, .... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: .web, .nom, ... adam
- Re: Re[2]: .web, .... Marc Schneiders
- Re: Re[2]: .we... adam
- Re: Re[2]: .we... Swerve
- Re: Re[2]: .web, .... Lee Hodgson (DomainGuideBook.com)
- Re: Re[2]: .we... adam
- Re: Re[2]: .we... Marc Schneiders
- Re[4]: .web, .nom,... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[4]: .we... adam
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... Ross Wm. Rader
- Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, ... Florian Effenberger
