Hello adam, Sunday, November 05, 2000, 6:47:07 AM, you wrote: > Marc Schneiders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> I can see that you have thought about this very long, since you >> present your reasons for the measures you suggest in such a balanced >> way. >> > There's nothing good to be said about domain aggregators. Nothing. They're in > the same class as spammers. Yes, so are other market speculators. Better ban this entire insidious practice. Real estate speculators also. -- Best regards, William mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... William X. Walsh
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... Swerve
- Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, ... William X. Walsh
- RE: Re[2]: .web, .nom, .sho... J. Scott Schiller
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... adam
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... Marc Schneiders
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... adam
- Re: .web, .nom, .s... Marc Schneiders
- Re: .web, .nom... adam
- Re: Re[2]: .web, .... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: .we... Marc Schneiders
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... Lee Hodgson (DomainGuideBook.com)
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... adam
- Re: .web, .nom, .s... Swerve
- Re[2]: .web, .... Florian Effenberger
- Re: .web, .nom, .s... Marc Schneiders
- Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, .... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: .web, .nom, ... adam
- Re: Re[2]: .web, .... Marc Schneiders
- Re: Re[2]: .we... adam
