On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, at 16:49 [=GMT-0000], adam wrote:

> "Lee Hodgson (DomainGuideBook.com)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> 
> > A few weeks ago, there were many people offering (multiple) domain names for
> > sale on the biz-ops list, including several people who are OpenSRS
> > resellers - are you calling them all scum?
> > 
> No, I'm not, and I believe that both yourself and Mark know exactly what I 
> meant. 

I think I for one did not.

> When I said "domain aggregators", I meant it as it's come to be 
> defined. People with automated "registration machines", registering ten 
> domains a minute from a dictionary file. 

Quite useless as all dictionary words are gone in com/net and to a
lesser degree org. But org's aren't worth money.

> People who register thousands - if 
> not tens of thousands - of domains, with no intention of ever using them.

Sure they use them, in the same way other people buy land or
houses: to make a profit. They may succeed and they may not. It is
taking a risk. And unlike in realestate you pay every year for a
domain.

[...]
> But I also believe that that registrants should not be allowed "sell" their 
> domains for more than a nominal sum. 

That would not help at all. They would be leased, rented whatever. 

> This is how it works in 90% of the 
> ccTLD's, 

Does it really? Ever looked at afternic.com or any of the other domain
auction sites?

> and I believe that's the way it should be. The gTLD namespace has 
> become a free-for-all. 

It is _not_ free. Domains cost money. The guys with 10,000 domains pay
at least some $70,000 yearly.

> ICANN made a complete mess of it, and they're shortly 
> about to make it worse. It's embarassing.
> 
> And I find the suggestion that these aggregators are poor insulting to my 
> intelligence...

Yes, maybe it was, though I am not sure that this is good for your
intelligence :-) I think most domain speculators are small people with
some 50, 100, 500 names. Those I know are. There are some big ones who
took all free three-letter and the like. I sincerely doubt they will
make money. Who wants j3q.com? 

-- 
Marc Schneiders (rest in header)



Reply via email to