Marc Schneiders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Again my compliments for presenting your case with such a detailed > argumentation. > I don't feel the need to argue Marc. If you think that someone has the right to register tens of thousands of domains with no intention of using them, and depriving other people of the ability to use them, that's your opinion. Me, I'll continue registering just the domains I or my customers need. And I won't allow them aggregate, cybersquat, typosquat or spam either. That's my perogative. I'll make my money in a more ethical manner, thank you. adam
- Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, ... Florian Effenberger
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... William X. Walsh
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... Swerve
- Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, ... William X. Walsh
- RE: Re[2]: .web, .nom, .sho... J. Scott Schiller
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... adam
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... Marc Schneiders
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... adam
- Re: .web, .nom, .s... Marc Schneiders
- Re[2]: .web, .... adam
- Re[2]: .web, .nom,... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: .we... Marc Schneiders
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... Lee Hodgson (DomainGuideBook.com)
- Re: .web, .nom, .shop, ... adam
- Re: .web, .nom, .s... Swerve
- Re[2]: .web, .... Florian Effenberger
- Re: .web, .nom, .s... Marc Schneiders
- Re[2]: .web, .nom, .shop, .... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: .web, .nom, ... adam
- Re: Re[2]: .web, .... Marc Schneiders
