How about we send you a list of domain names which have been transferred,
and you make them go away?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Robert L Mathews"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 1:58 PM
Subject: RE: transferred domains still being included in deactivated list.
> Here's the deal folks - we've made it obvious that when domains have left
in
> the past, that we've done nothing to block the transfers. We've also left
> the information within the system due to a design assumption error that
> Scott, Tom and I made waaaay back when. We also all agree that this is
> heinous and goofy.
>
> Our big issue right now is figuring out a) what our database currently
says
> (easy) b) what domain name we are authoritative for (harder). Ken has come
> up with a methodology to take care of this and will working on scrubbing
the
> pipes over the coming days (I can't comment on what his timelines are, I
> have no idea, but I bet he does). This doesn't solve the problem moving
> forward, but it does solve it looking back. I also understand that Ken and
> Scott are working on a permanent fix to make this go away forever.
>
> Anyways, I just wanted to jump in and let you all know that this issue
> *does* have our attention and we are diligently working on it...
>
> -rwr
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Harris
> > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 1:24 PM
> > To: Robert L Mathews
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: transferred domains still being included in deactivated
> > list.
> >
> >
> >
> > I agree 100%.
> >
> > One note: I say we all send these "critical meltdown issues"
> > which have been
> > ignored to [EMAIL PROTECTED] From what I've been told this
> > goes directly
> > to management and they do pay attention to the requests.
> >
> > David
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert L Mathews
> > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 12:50 PM
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: transferred domains still being included in deactivated
list.
> >
> > At 4/19/01 8:41 AM, easygoing wrote:
> >
> > >I wish you would do something about making the removal of
> > >transferred domains from the database a much higher priority
> > >for OpenSRS. Like a critical melt down priority.
> >
> > I have to pipe up and concur again. I can't believe how long this has
> > gone unaddressed.
> >
> > It should be a trivial fix. Assuming there's a flag in the database
> > indicating these domains have been transferred away (which is the
> > impression I got from previous OpenSRS posts about this), it's literally
> > maybe five lines of code to prevent sending the notices for those
domains.
> >
> > I don't understand why this hasn't been fixed. It could be fixed an hour
> > from now. Please just do it.
> >
> >
> > >I can just imagine the reactions that we are going to
> > >receive as OpenSRS sends the one day deactivation notice to
> > >these domains telling them that the domain will be deleted
> > >if they don't immediately pay up when the domains are no
> > >longer with OpenSRS and can not be deleted by OpenSRS.
> >
> > No need to imagine; it's happened to me. The guy gave me a royal reaming
> > about my company's competence and honesty, and told me he'd never do
> > business with us again. Ha ha! What fun.
> >
> > --
> > Robert L Mathews, Tiger Technologies
> >
