I don't think that anyone could disagree with the content of your response,
William. However, easygoing was not asking anyone to breach any agreement,
either directly, indirectly, or vaguely. Your response is really light
years away from easygoing's the point.
At 10:01 PM 4/25/01 -0700, William X. Walsh wrote:
>Hello easygoing,
>
>Wednesday, April 25, 2001, 9:56:32 PM, easygoing wrote:
>
> > If what you claim was the case, then ICANN would have shut
> > these other two down.
>
>Just because ICANN and Verisign are being lax about enforcing their
>contacts does not justify asking Tucows to breach them.
>
>
>--
>Best regards,
> William mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----
Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55 (972) 788-2364 Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate
----
