Re: Digest version of this list?

[cpaul]

> We played around with digest a bit, couldn't get it to work properly (well,
> got it to work - kinda, it was a horribly ugly mess), so we decided to scrap
> that and wait until we had a better list server.
> 
> We're still waiting.  But it's hard to make a case when it works *most* of
> the time, ya know?


gnu mailman digests would go down a treat.  all in favor?