Well I have a client, a single lady, that ahhh ... offers "massages" through
her website (legal in her jurisdiction). She might be very interested in
.pro :-)
cheers!
david
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Jeftovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rick Baraniuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Discuss-List@Opensrs. Org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 11:24 PM
Subject: Re: .name Feedback
>
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Rick Baraniuk wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> > Was hoping to get some feedback from you with regards to what will be
our
> > next product offering: .name.
> >
> > We have just put up an information document here:
> > http://www.opensrs.org/dotname_info.shtml which contains information
about
> > the 4 products associated with .name:
> > 1. Domain Name Registration
> > 2. Email Forwarding
> > 3. Defensive Registrations
> > 4. NameWatch
> >
>
> I'm personally sick and tired of "defending my name" in all these new
> TLDs and in my opinion it seems kinda bogus to roll it out "defense" as
> an actual product, it further stigmatizes these new TLDs as one big cash
> grab.
>
> I think .name and .pro are going to flop. The 3rd LD model won't appeal
> on a mass level and everybody who just scrambled to cover their butts
> in .info and .biz are going to get hit with .name and .pro and just
> say to hell with it. Get ready for the backlash.
>
> We haven't had anybody asking about .name or .pro yet.
>
> As always, I could me completely wrong. It's monday.
>
> -mark
>
> --
> mark jeftovic
> http://www.easydns.com
> http://mark.jeftovic.net
>
>
>
