With all respect Joe, I am opposed to one individual or organization controlling common words used in domain suffixes. In this case, i find it somewhat incredulous that you are claiming exclusive use of .God. Your arguement that first come first serve gives you exclusivity of .God doesn't hold water for me.
The control of common words should not be dominated by private interests or special interest .orgs. There's too much at stake. Same goes for the New.Net approach. Swerve > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 12:21:52 -0500 (EST) > To: Spy OpenSRS Mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Born in the dot USA! > > > http://www.dot-god.com/communications/TLD_Networks_Ltd/public_announcement.h tm> l > > On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Spy OpenSRS Mail wrote: > >> What the f is this? >> >> A client of ours is asking us to poke around and dig up info on this dot USA >> TLD. >> >> Anybody know the details of this? I'm sure it is not for real but I need to >> know what I'm talking about when I reply. I'm sure you guys know the deal. >> (I mean fellow list members, not Tucows) <laugh> >> >> Lars >> >> SpyProductions >> Achieve Web Success >> http://www.spyproductions.com >> vox: 302.369.3060 fax: 302.369.6040 >> ----------------------------------- >> support: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Web services: domain names-hosting-design >> Since 1991 SpyProductions serves the globe >> > > -- > The dot.GOD Registry, Limited > > http://www.dot-god.com/ > >
