Just to let you all know - I had popped off the radar last night (today was supposed to be a day off) but I am on my way in to co-ordinate a few things, and I will post an update addressing all this in a couple of hours - so hang in there please!
sA Scott Allan Director, OpenSRS [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Ross Wm. Rader wrote: > > According to what I can piece together from > > the accusations and the vague OpenSRS responses, it looks like OpenSRS > > believes they have found a "gray area" of the contracts that they think > > allows them to take ownership of the customer's domain -- the customer I > > got for them -- and make a profit off it without involving me. > > Scott is on vacation, so let me jump in here.... > > His team is attempting to put together a service that will allow our > resellers to offer a product bundle more similar to that offered by other > industry players. Again, I'll note that I haven't kept completely > up-to-speed with what Scott and the gang are up to, but from what I have > seen on this list and gathered around the water-cooler, he/we are completely > approaching this as a channel product. The rub lies with the management > platform. Being a wholesaler, technically, isn't a piece of cake when it > comes to introducing new services (read the exciting new novel "Darryl > Green's Big Adventure in CertLand" for more details). This pilot is very > much a "let's try something, see what we break and then fix it before we get > to the design stage" effort. > > My question for all of you is are you opposed to the project because you > aren't part of the pilot or are you opposed to it because it isn't right to > do something like this under any circumstances (even when it is available to > all of our resellers)? Or is it something else? Understanding this will > really go a long way in allowing us to more appropriately interpret what you > are all saying to us - sort of the most important part of the pilot (getting > feedback I mean). > > -rwr > >
