Hello, --- Kris Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > George Kirikos wrote: > > It would be an anti-trust matter, I'm sure, if NSI tried such a > thing, > > to take control over all expired names. Under your model, they need > not > > even sell them to 3rd parties -- they can keep them for themselves > if > > they so decided. > > Sure, why not? If they want to spend the money to pay the registry > for > each one, that's their perogative.
Thanks, that's exactly my point. If that's where you stand, that NSI or OpenSRS should have had 100% control of beijing.com, voice.com, compare.com, peking.com, canary.com, etc. when they expired, there's no point in trying to convince you that it's not in my interest for that situation to occur. Sincerely, George Kirikos http://www.kirikos.com/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com
