ezgoing8 wrote: > > spam is wrong. > > But the net vigilante approach of fighting it is just as wrong. In fact it > is worse than spam as it deliberately sets out to disable the email service > for at least 255 other users on the server that did not spam. > > Go after the spammer, yes. but don't use the terrorist mindset of injuring > innocent webmasters to make the point that spam is wrong.
I'll agree to that. The way it was described earlier, that's wrong. But if I had my way, spam-friendly ISP's would be blackholed off the net completely... but approaching it saying "I'm going to block one more /24 for every day you don't resolve this" is wrong. -kb -- Kris Benson ABC Communications +1 (250)612-5270 x204 +1 (888)235-1174 x204
