This is correct, the requirement is that the servers must be physically
located in the US

I'm seeking further clarification of this for canadian entities that run
their hosting in the US (or US companies that run their hosting in
Canada).  Other clarification I'm searching for is whether or not the IPs
must be registered in the US as well (i.e. our ARIN block is registered to
our Flint office, but the IPs are routed to IBM in Canada - another RSP
has their IPs registered to a Canadian office, but the IPs are routed to a
co-lo in the US)

This is a DoC requirement imposed on the .us registry, thus far I've not
gotten a response to the clarification (rather, I got a "We'll ask and
find out" and nothing since)

Charles Daminato
TUCOWS Product Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Winston D. Neutel wrote:

> > I don't see anything about hosting or nameservers to be in the U.S.  The
> > only requirements are that the *registrant* meet one of the nexus
> > requirements.
> 
> http://www.nic.us/policies/docs/ustld_nexus_requirements.pdf
> On page 2 -- just above the description of Nexus Category 1 -- it says that
> the registrar must certify the following three things.
> 
> <quote>
> -- Certification that Registrant satisfies Nexus requirement - if not
> completed, then registration will be rejected;
> -- Basis for compliance (Nexus Category 1, 2, or 3) - if not completed, then
> registration will be rejected
> -- Certification that the listed name servers are located within the United
> States - if not completed, then registration will be rejected
> </quote>
> 
> I read this to mean that the requirement that the name servers be located
> within the US is in addition to the nexus requirements.
> 
> Now, if you want to be very literal, requiring that the registrar certifies
> (at the time of registration) that the nameservers are located within the US
> is not quite the same as requiring that .us domain registrants never use
> non-US nameservers . . . but splitting those hairs will be left for someone
> whose legal department has a bigger budget than mine :-)
> 
> -Winston
> 
> 

Reply via email to