David,
All this airing out on the open list sounds more like sour grapes than an actual resolution seeking grievance. Get a grip, man! Charles Daminato is going out of his way to achieve resolution for the situation.
Now if all the facts from both sides were presented here, I would be most interested in reading about what went on. And certainly Tucows would be interested in protecting themselves if there was a flaw in there system. Considering the level of liability that Tucows would be open to should an elemental engineering flaw exist, I would think that it could easily be believed by all that they would want to address it more immediately than yourself.
How can you ever hope to achieve any real resolution if you insist on being so unreasonable? Let the man work and recognize that there are somethings that cannot be changed. You'll find you're life a little less stressful that way. It would be a hard press to convince people here that appropriate actions are not being taken.
I, for one, never appreciate a tantrum.
Karyn
-----Original Message-----
From: David Denney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:52 AM
To: Charles Daminato
Cc: opensrs discuss
Subject: Re: hijacking, AGAIN
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 03:17:39PM -0500, Charles Daminato wrote:
> Additionally, *we* didn't *do* this to him. *We* didn't *give* your
> customer's domain away
I think you did.
It turns out the 'first' occurrence of this hijacking was
due to a forged modify using the old netsol system. We recovered
the domain, and moved it to OpenSRS with assurance to the customer
that it wouldnt happen again.
I think the other Jason Ingram _called_ opensrs and social engineered
his way into faxing his ID and claiming his old email address was
invalid and you guys gave him the domain, effectively, without even
sending an email to the old "defunct" email address (which was in fact
not defunct, nor was his phone number). I'm surprised he didnt move it
to a new registrar already.
> It's also hard to track down - the original order was for "Jason Ingram",
You could have phoned or emailed the rightful owner!
> the domain is currently owned by "Jason Ingram". A recent renewal was
> made by the current registrant (or the renewal was made while the current
> registrant was listed) which was March 5th; this means the domain was
> under the current registrants control as early as March 5th.
My customer admits he might not have noticed in the time from
the 5th until now. Just because this domain is not his company's
'identity' (only his personal domain) does not make this situation
any better.
> Charles Daminato
--
David Denney | D i m e n s i o n a l C o m m u n i c a t i o n s |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | DSL * Wireless * ISDN * Frame * ATM * PtP * Co-Lo |
303-285-INET voice | http://www.dimensional.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
888-3-DIMCOM tollfree | Based in Denver, serving the Front-Range and beyond |
...they can have my ssh when they pry the keyboard out of my cold, dead hands!
