Monday, Monday, March 18, 2002, 11:27:54 AM, David Denney wrote: > On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 02:11:38PM -0500, Charles Daminato wrote: >> Good thing we didn't do anything over the weekend in haste...
> Why? The real owner IS who I stated on friday, > though he's been without his domain longer than I thought > it is still his domain and he is intitled to have > control of it returned to him as quickly as possible. IF this is the case, and there there is evidence to support it, and the singer can't establish that he got the name through legitimate means (i.e. a sale from the previous registrant, who is now crying foul), then your customer should get in touch with an attorney. -- Best regards, William X Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --
