> From: "Dave Warren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Dave Warren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 12:43:33 -0600
> To: "Mike Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "discuss-list"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Moving renewal dates...
>
>> Some people like this suffer from "Paradigms" and until they realize
> that
>> they will not accept any "New" thoughts/ideas or advice...
>
> Despite my urge to beat anyone who says "paradigms", which is an entirely
> personal problem, this IS a reality (at the moment)
Despite my urge to unload my super soaker squirt gun (water) on anyone who
has the urge to beat anyone who says "paradigms"...
but i digress,... we all Know this "IS" a reality right now. People are
batting around and forming an idea about seeing how to change the reality
with it's inherent pluses and minuses.
>
> In all likelihood it won't change, there's just no reason for the registry
> to have any interest in implementing this.
Uh,... what level are you referring to? Verisign or Icann? Either way, the
"reason" is that their customers may want it, or their customers customers
may want it. Of course, change does come slow with both of those entities,
but change does occur. If not, shut down Icann and take control away from
Verisign. Yahooey.
The idea in my head would still require a 1 year minimum, with an addition x
months added on to consolidate with the one date. This would Increase the
revenue of each transaction for those who like the consolidation concept for
the domains they manage.
Swerve
>
>
> --
> The nice thing about standards, there is enough for everyone to have their
> own.
>
>
