At 9/12/02 12:13 PM, Charles Daminato wrote: >Check the notes directly from the original declined order > >Also - stick this burr in Verisign's arse: > >Given that the default registry mechanism for an untouched transfer request >is to ACK the transfer.... > >and given that the ONLY way the transfer could have been declined is by a >specific action (NACK) on Verisign's part.... > >How could they have NACKd the transfer if they didn't know about it? >Methinks there's a serious flaw in their system, or ... some such.
For what it's worth, I also had a transfer declined by VeriSign three days ago in which: - OpenSRS showed it as being submitted to the registry - No message was ever received from VeriSign - It was rejected after just four days - I called Verisign registrar, and they say they have no record of a transfer request ever being received, and therefore they didn't deny it. As Chuck says, this should be impossible. I can't wait until we see the fruit of Ross's work on the transfers task force. (In case anyone is wondering, I resubmitted the transfer and it went through in two days. Sheesh.) ------------------------------------ Robert L Mathews, Tiger Technologies
