----- Original Message ----- From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Robert L Mathews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 8:25 PM Subject: Re: OpenSRS Live Reseller Update [Domains] - 08/04/2004
> > Considering the security implications vs. the legality, does this mean > > you're going to set up anonymizing/forwarding in your registration product? > > IIRC, Tucows policy implementation allows resellers to do this without > our involvement. Maybe James can clarify as it has been a while since I > looked at the internal policy on this particular point... Now wait a minute... You just got done saying: > Knowlingly providing false information in your whois record is about > to become a pretty serious legal offense in the U.S. and its already > cause for revocation of the domain name per the registrant agreement. > I would seriously advise anyone that takes their business seriously > not to follow Robert's lead. How can Tucows policy be to advocate having a reseller do something that could potentially jeopardize the customer's domain, and something that is about to become illegal? Who, besides the reseller could determine that it was the reseller and not the registrant that provided the false information. And what difference would it make from a legal standpoint?
