p.s. The Swiss have, through the centuries, developed a real sense of
checks and balances in participatory decession making porocesses that
really efficently get things done in a way that they feel satisfied
their goals and aims are being met.

I'll rest on this now - I hope that it helps any one who is
contemplating  these issues.

Paul

On 19 October 2010 12:16, Paul A Norman <[email protected]> wrote:
> I personally realsie and appreciate that a lot of focuus has been on
> the divorce from Oracle.
>
> But there is an old saying that the seed that is sown in the ground is
> the seed that grows.
>
> Turn things around from "leaving Oracle" - "getting the community
> together" and refocuss in short order on why you have seperated from
> Oracle - to be in a position to be able to do a better job.
>
> And now focuss on what that better job is.
>
> You have highly talkanted developers amongst you - that hardly needs
> to be a better job it is very well done already - itds the overall
> product if I may use that word, and servicing your clientelle. That is
> the future.
>
> But if that is not at heart now, then the seed that will be growing
> into a onster tree is a movement about not being under an awful ogre
> (any number of corporations).
>
> The new community is by any definition a corporation (a body
> corporate) jsut not a private profit making one
>
> The questoin is what sort of corpoation will it become, and what does
> it exist for? Just some thoughts.
>
> 1. Quality customer service
> 2. Decission making porocesses that really utilise client feedback
> 3. UI development that really takes User experience and concerns to
> the heart of decission making
> 4. Feature devlopment and external process integration that leads the
> field and pre-empts clients' needs
> 5. Care for its own members professional and skill cultivation to meet
> these sorts of aims.
> 6. Unashamedly adopt policies, mandates, and leadership structures and
> review processes that facilitate the development and implementaton of
> the various component parts of the project(s)
> 7. Elect leaders for fixed terms (what ever) find a mechanism to move
> forward with out having to have a refunrendum on every single point
> great and small
> 8 Recognise and Give real places to people in needed expertese areas
> who are not dvelopers as such!
>
> Paul
>
> On 19 October 2010 11:45, Jon Hamkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 10/18/2010 03:00 PM, Roxy Robinson wrote:
>>
>>> Well, you can think what you want to think and I, as just a common
>>> every day, 9 year user of OOo, will think what I want to think. Your
>>> thoughts went way beyond what I said needed to be done, anyway. To
>>> release any software, beta or otherwise, [without] the
>>> support/instruction function in place, is stupid! IMHO!!!
>>
>> (Roxy, please quote properly, so people won't get confused about who said
>> what.  Thanks.)
>>
>> Well, you have a pretty strong opinion for it being humble.   I don't think
>> anyone here is stupid, least of all the organizers and developers of TDF.
>>  That's just rude.  They are doing an awesome job.   I guess we'll agree to
>> disagree.
>>
>> Also, it seems you are attempting to establish reputation by touting 9 years
>> usage, or perhaps I am misunderstanding your reason for mentioning it?  Does
>> this matter?  I don't think it does, but if you want to have that contest
>> please realize that I have been using StarOffice/OOo for a few years longer
>> than you -- I forget when StarDivision starting making it available free for
>> personal use, 1998, I think.
>>
>> It's beta software, so there should be no expectation that a common user
>> would be installing it -- there is a warning on the site that says it's not
>> for production use.  The point I think is to send a message that LibO is
>> going to make the rubber hit the road, right out of the gate. Considering
>> all of the vaporware out there, I think that LibO is off to an awesome
>> start.
>>
>> And, it worked -- it got the community going.  The beta was downloaded 80
>> 000 times in the first week, and the developer list is going gang-busters on
>> patches.  I consider this a wild success so far.
>>
>>
>>     ----Jon
>>
>> --
>> E-mail to [email protected] for instructions on how to
>> unsubscribe
>> List archives are available at
>> http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
>> All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
>> deleted
>>
>>
>

--
E-mail to [email protected] for instructions on how to 
unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted

Reply via email to