I was saying I have been using OOo 9 years - and actually when I start counting
its probably a year or 2 longer - only because I have used it exclusively as my
office program. I'm not trying to establish a reputation for anything except
for being a bit dissatisfied with the way things are going right now. Are these
the same, or different folks, that are supposed to be bringing forth an OOo
3.3? If not, what happened to it?
As I said previously, I already knew of the Oracle takeover of Sun through one
of the several computer related newsletters I subscribe to. When I heard that
it bothered me a little in regard to whether OOo would continue to be available
or not. And then out of the blue I get an email announcing LibreOffice, and
that the first beta is available for download. Yeah, it says it shouldn't be
considered to be "ready for production". My first thought is "what the heck
happened to the next release of OOo that they had been talking about". Is this
a "replacement" product with another name? Go to the website for the download
and there is really no information there explaining what the heck is going on.
So I go ahead and download LO while I am there. Only later to find out - no
this isn't an upgrade to OOo; its another product. But I guess, similar to
OOo????? And, I will guarantee you there are a ton of other folks out here with
the same questions I had/have!!! I know all the folks tha
t I've introduced to OOo over the years have them. And TDF may be doing an
outstanding job - but I don't see it!!!! They sent me the link to the download,
but I'm certainly not a beta tester. So I'm still pretty much in the dark on
what to expect. And, yes, I do have a fairly strong opinion about that, but
that does not mean it is not an humble one!
Roxy Robinson
On 10/18/2010 03:00 PM, Roxy Robinson wrote:
> Well, you can think what you want to think and I, as just a common
> every day, 9 year user of OOo, will think what I want to think. Your
> thoughts went way beyond what I said needed to be done, anyway. To
> release any software, beta or otherwise, [without] the
> support/instruction function in place, is stupid! IMHO!!!
(Roxy, please quote properly, so people won't get confused about who
said what. Thanks.)
Well, you have a pretty strong opinion for it being humble. I don't
think anyone here is stupid, least of all the organizers and developers
of TDF. That's just rude. They are doing an awesome job. I guess
we'll agree to disagree.
Also, it seems you are attempting to establish reputation by touting 9
years usage, or perhaps I am misunderstanding your reason for mentioning
it? Does this matter? I don't think it does, but if you want to have
that contest please realize that I have been using StarOffice/OOo for a
few years longer than you -- I forget when StarDivision starting making
it available free for personal use, 1998, I think.
It's beta software, so there should be no expectation that a common user
would be installing it -- there is a warning on the site that says it's
not for production use. The point I think is to send a message that
LibO is going to make the rubber hit the road, right out of the gate.
Considering all of the vaporware out there, I think that LibO is off to
an awesome start.
And, it worked -- it got the community going. The beta was downloaded
80 000 times in the first week, and the developer list is going
gang-busters on patches. I consider this a wild success so far.
----Jon
--
E-mail to [email protected] for instructions on how to
unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted
--
E-mail to [email protected] for instructions on how to
unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted
