Hi Jean-Christophe,
Jean-Christophe Helary wrote (19-10-10 14:10)
On 19 oct. 10, at 19:35, Cor Nouws wrote:
In any case, the current "global" lists are not global, they are
English lists and should be identified as such.
They are handling global items, as I see it. I do not mind if some
people post there in a language that I do not understand (and there
are many) but then I cannot join nor help.
Some others would.
That is not what you intend I think?
What I suggest is that lists where the language is English are
identified by a @en.libreoffice.org.
Call them global or whatever you want, but identify them with a
@en.libreoffice.org.
There is no need for a "global" user list
Joining the global users lists, gives the largest public, so more
knowledge / international exchange. I find that useful in some
cases.
That works only for people who understand English. So it is not
global by definition.
That is true, so a [email protected] would show that
difference.
Mind that common is (was?) that there is for example
an users@<language>.documentfoundation.org
as well as
a marketing or a dev@<language>.documentfoundation.org.
The place where people in a certain language area work together.
For English that obviously does not work, and for Spanish and maybe more
languages too.
Therefore, we already see a list for a local/regional group in the US
(iirc).
So this discussion more or less fits in that space?
regards,
Cor
--
- giving openoffice.org its foundation :: The Document Foundation -
- ideas/remarks for the community council? See
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Community_Council
--
E-mail to [email protected] for instructions on how to
unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted
